FAQ
Readyline vs PreVeil questions
The questions that come up when contractors map their stack.
Yes, if you handle CUI. Readyline does not encrypt or store CUI. We track your compliance program. NIST 800-171 §3.13.11 (FIPS-validated cryptography) applies to your CUI handling tools (PreVeil, Kiteworks, Virtru), not to a compliance tracker. If you handle CUI in any form (email, file storage), you need a FIPS-validated handler.
Yes, if you need CMMC certification. PreVeil handles the cryptographic safeguarding side. Readyline handles the rest: NIST 800-171 control implementation, SSP, POA&M, SPRS scoring, C3PAO assessment workflow. PreVeil alone gets you compliant on §3.13.x (system communications protection). You still need to demonstrate the other 13 control families.
Not via a deep API today. The practical integration: you export PreVeil's access reports and audit logs (CSV / JSON), upload them as evidence in Readyline against the control families they satisfy. We're scoping a tighter integration with PreVeil for evidence auto-collection in a future quarter. Talk to us on the demo call if that's blocking.
PreVeil is FedRAMP-listed for CUI handling (check the FedRAMP Marketplace for their current authorization). Readyline does NOT hold FedRAMP authorization, because we do not store or transmit CUI. FedRAMP applies to platforms that handle CUI on behalf of federal customers; Readyline holds compliance metadata, not the CUI itself. Different scope.
Yes. The C3PAO needs to see your CUI handling (PreVeil) and your compliance program (Readyline) to assess CMMC. Readyline's read-only assessor mode gives them scoped access to the compliance side; PreVeil has its own assessor access pattern. Most C3PAOs are comfortable with the two-tool stack, it's the common configuration.
