We never send CUI to the AI model. AI assists with policy drafting and questionnaire answers, grounded in your real compliance state.
AI for compliance is useful: drafting policies from your environment, answering security questionnaires with citations to your real state, scaffolding the SSP narrative. AI in federal contracting is also fraught. Sending CUI to a public LLM can violate DFARS, and most off-the-shelf AI features in horizontal GRC do exactly that. Readyline's AI architecture is designed for federal contracting realities: zero CUI to the model. Our standard SaaS calls the Anthropic API, where the model only ever sees compliance metadata (never CUI). For customers who require an authorized inference path, we deploy a sovereign single-tenant instance in your AWS GovCloud tenancy, where Claude on Amazon Bedrock holds FedRAMP High and DoD IL4/5 authorization. Air-gapped deployments run AI-disabled.
No CUI to the model · GovCloud Bedrock for sovereign deployments · Air-gapped runs AI-free
Three architectural shortcuts that fail federal contracting compliance.
Most horizontal GRC AI features send the customer's data, sometimes including CUI, to a commercial LLM API. Where that data is CUI, DFARS 252.204-7012 requires it stay inside an authorized boundary, and putting CUI through an unauthorized endpoint can jeopardize your contract.
The commercial OpenAI and Anthropic APIs are not themselves FedRAMP authorized. Authorized inference paths do exist (Claude on AWS Bedrock GovCloud is FedRAMP High / IL4-5; Azure OpenAI carries a FedRAMP High authorization), but only if the vendor actually deploys there, and only matters if CUI is in play.
AI features that require outbound calls cannot deploy in air-gapped environments. Platforms that bake AI into the core (rather than as an optional layer) become unusable for primes preparing for L3.
Six design choices that keep AI useful without violating contract.
Readyline is a compliance tracking platform, not a CUI handler. The AI only sees what you intentionally feed it: policy templates, your control narratives, questionnaire questions. CUI artifacts (the data your CUI tools like PreVeil/Kiteworks handle) never enter the system.
Standard Readyline SaaS calls the Anthropic API directly, and because we never send CUI to the model, that path is within DFARS bounds for the compliance metadata it processes. For customers who require an authorized inference boundary, we deploy a sovereign single-tenant instance in your AWS GovCloud tenancy, where Claude on Amazon Bedrock holds FedRAMP High and DoD IL4/5 authorization. On that path the inference layer inherits Bedrock's authorization.
In air-gapped deployments, AI features are simply OFF. The rest of the platform (SSP, POA&M, risk register, evidence collection) works fully without AI. AI is a layer, not a dependency.
AI policy drafts cite the specific NIST 800-171 controls they address. Questionnaire answers cite the specific evidence file they're grounded in. No hallucinated control numbers, no fabricated evidence.
AI drafts policies, you review and approve. AI suggests questionnaire answers, you confirm. Nothing auto-applies to production state without a human approval log entry.
Every AI interaction is logged in the per-tenant database: who asked, what prompt, what response, when approved. Auditable trail for the C3PAO if AI assistance is part of your compliance workflow.
Precise questions deserve precise answers, no overclaiming here.
30 minutes. Founder-led. No slides. Walk away with a clearer view of your CMMC posture, either way.
Book a demoReply within 1 business day · ES/EN · or email us directly.